1. Key points in brief

• Bee metamorphosis is not simple growth: the larva is profoundly transformed into an adult.
• Capped brood appears motionless, but it is a phase of intense biological reconstruction.
• The 3-6-12 beekeeping rule of thumb remains useful for the worker bee, provided a margin for natural variability is kept.
• Metamorphosis depends on complex cellular, hormonal and nutritional mechanisms.
• At the apiary, the benefit is mainly practical: reading the age of the brood more accurately and avoiding unnecessary stress on capped brood.

2. What the study shows

Fig. Time scheme of metamorphosis and moults. (Photo source: pre-pupae and pigmented pupae, Elias-Neto et al. 2009. White pupa: Scott Camazine, Science Photo Library; adult bee: US Geological Survey.)

This chapter summarises how the article explains the transition from egg to adult bee, with particular emphasis on the hidden phase of capped brood.

Research question. Janine Kievits's article seeks to answer an apparently simple question: what happens inside a capped cell so that a white, soft larva almost entirely organised for feeding becomes, in less than three weeks, an adult bee capable of walking, flying, orienting itself, learning and taking part in colony life?

Nature of the document. This is not an original experimental study, but a popular-science article published in La Santé de l'Abeille. The author brings together work from morphology, histology, physiology, neurobiology and endocrinology. The references span foundational work on bee metamorphosis and development as well as more recent studies on tissues, hormones, the cuticle and imaginal cells.

Findings. The article first recalls that the bee is a holometabolous insect: the larva does not resemble the adult, in contrast to hemimetabolous insects whose young already look like small adults. In the bee, transformation goes through a pupal stage and involves a deep reorganisation of the body.

After the egg is laid, embryonic development begins rapidly. The first cells divide and gradually differentiate to form the tissues that make up the larva. However, some undifferentiated embryonic cells, known as imaginal cells, persist in the larva and later contribute to the formation of adult structures. This idea is essential for understanding metamorphosis: the adult bee is not simply an enlarged larva, but is largely rebuilt from structures prepared very early in development.

The bee larva is first and foremost an "eating machine". It receives abundant food, grows very fast and accumulates reserves in its fat body. It undergoes four successive larval moults between the 4th and 7th day after egg laying, reaching its maximum weight of about 150 mg just before capping. The practical benchmark taught in beekeeping — 3 days as egg, 6 days as open brood, 12 days as capped brood for the worker — remains useful for calculations at the apiary, since emergence takes place roughly 21 days after egg laying. The article nevertheless points out that the actual durations can vary between individuals and conditions.

After capping, the larva spins its cocoon, defecates, stretches out and enters a phase often called pre-pupal. From a more technical standpoint, recent literature tends to use the term pharate pupa, since the next stage is already forming beneath the old cuticle before the visible moult occurs. This distinction is not necessary for routine work at the apiary, but it makes clear that the transformation begins before it can be clearly observed.

Metamorphosis then combines two complementary processes. On the one hand, a large part of the larval organs breaks down: some cells die through autophagy, meaning that they digest part of their own components, or through apoptosis, a form of programmed cell death in which the cell fragments and is then eliminated. Their components can subsequently be recycled. On the other hand, the adult organs gradually develop from imaginal cells already present, while using materials released by the breakdown of larval tissues: appendages, muscles, digestive tract, Malpighian tubules, cuticle, brain and neural connections. The tissues do not all share the same fate: some are almost entirely rebuilt, others are remodelled, and others disappear.

The regulation of this transformation depends in particular on juvenile hormone and ecdysteroids. As long as juvenile hormone remains high enough, moults retain a larval character. When its level drops and ecdysteroids act differently, metamorphosis can begin. The article cautiously notes that some upstream mechanisms are better understood in model insects such as Drosophila or the tobacco hornworm than in the honey bee.

The end of development can be partly read in pigmentation: the eyes shift from white to pink, then to brown, while the cuticle forms, takes on colour and hardens through sclerotization. The imago appears inside the still-capped cell, then the bee cuts open the cap with its mandibles. At emergence, the young bee weighs about 110 mg — less than the mature larva: part of the stored reserves has been consumed by metamorphosis itself.

Interpretation. The central message for the beekeeper is that capped brood is not a passive phase. Behind an apparently quiet frame, the colony is producing adults still in full biological construction. This phase depends on the reserves accumulated at the larval stage, on the temperature maintained by the workers, on the brood's health status and on the absence of excessive stress.

3. Critical assessment

The article is solid as a pedagogical synthesis but should not be read as an experimental study or as a beekeeping management guide.

Strengths. The text gathers in a single narrative elements that are often scattered: embryology, larval growth, cocoon spinning, moults, dismantling of larval tissues, formation of adult structures, hormones and pigmentation. For a beekeeping audience, this is useful: metamorphosis becomes understandable without being reduced to a mere timetable.

The article also has the merit of not presenting beekeeping benchmarks as absolute durations. The 3-6-12 scheme remains a practical basis, but it does not eliminate biological variability. This nuance matters for queen rearing, splits, treatments or any intervention that depends on the age of the brood.

Limitations. The main limitation lies in the nature of the document: it is a popular-science article, not a systematic review with a defined bibliographic selection protocol, nor a study producing new data. Some references are older but remain important for the morphology and chronology of development. Other mechanisms, especially the upstream signals of hormonal regulation, are discussed on the basis of findings from other model insects.

Possible biases and confusions. Precision of vocabulary can create a difficulty. The term "pre-pupa" is intuitive for the beekeeper, but it is not always the most precise in developmental biology. The notion of pharate pupa, centred on apolysis, more accurately describes the moment when the previous stage has not yet been left while the next is already forming. This nuance does not change apiary practice, but it prevents the assumption that stages only begin when they become visible.

Another limitation concerns practical implications. The article describes mainly normal metamorphosis. It does not directly test the effect of opening a hive, of temporary cooling, of excess heat, of varroa pressure, of a virus or of a contaminant. These factors matter at the apiary, but they must be discussed with complementary studies and not mechanically deduced from the article.

What cannot be concluded. No new beekeeping rule can be drawn from this synthesis. Nor can changes in pigmentation be turned into a perfectly accurate dating method for brood. Finally, a newly emerged bee is not yet a fully functional bee: its cuticle still has to harden and its flight, thermoregulation and work capacities develop progressively.

4. What related studies show

This chapter does not summarise Kievits's article itself: it situates this synthesis within the related literature.

The studies mentioned here are not all part of Janine Kievits's original article. They serve to distinguish what is directly confirmed by closely related work, what provides mechanistic support and what limits the practical interpretation at the apiary.

Direct precursors. The work of Jay and of Oertel remains a major foundation for understanding the ontogeny of the worker bee. Jay describes development in the cell from the egg to the adult ready to emerge, as well as the cocoon and the colour changes of the pupa (Jay, 1962, 1963, 1964). Oertel follows metamorphosis at the histological level, particularly after capping (Oertel, 1930). These studies still structure much of the vocabulary used to describe pre-imaginal stages.

Methodological complement. The work of Elias-Neto and colleagues refines the modern terminology around the metamorphic moult. They emphasise apolysis — the detachment of the old cuticle — as an important marker for understanding the transition from larva to pupa. They also document the formation and maturation of the cuticle, particularly through genes involved in pigmentation and sclerotization (Elias-Neto et al., 2009, 2010, 2013). This reinforces the view that observable colour changes are not mere visual details but signs of a regulated integumentary process.

Mechanistic support. Studies on juvenile hormone and ecdysteroids confirm the general logic presented in the article: these hormones contribute to the larva–pupa–adult transitions. In the bee, the same pathways are also involved in queen–worker differentiation, but through different hormone titre profiles, tissue sensitivities and gene expression patterns rather than through entirely separate hormones (Rachinsky et al., 1990; Mello et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2023). This point matters: general metamorphosis and caste differentiation are linked but should not be conflated.

Tissue destruction and reconstruction. Several recent studies confirm that metamorphosis relies on a combination of autophagy, apoptosis, remodelling and mobilisation of reserves. The larval salivary glands, the Malpighian tubules, the digestive tract and the fat body are not simply preserved as they are: depending on the tissue, they are destroyed, rebuilt or remodelled (Silva-Zacarin et al., 2007; Gonçalves et al., 2017; Tettamanti & Casartelli, 2019; Yu et al., 2025). These studies confirm the biological core of the article, but with more recent cellular and molecular tools.

Limits for practical interpretation. Studies on brood temperature show that pupal development is sensitive to thermal deviations, especially when these are prolonged or experimental. Researchers have observed effects on developmental duration, longevity, brain organisation, learning ability and mortality of adults raised in brood exposed to suboptimal temperatures (Tautz et al., 2003; Groh et al., 2004; Mędrzycki et al., 2010; Wang et al., 2016). These results do not mean that a brief inspection in suitable weather is dangerous, but they remind us that capped brood is not biologically indifferent to stress.

Studies on Varroa destructor add another practical limitation. The parasite reproduces precisely in capped brood and can affect development, emergence weight, wings, thorax, and the later flight or foraging abilities of emerging bees (Yang et al., 2021). The biology of metamorphosis helps explain why these effects may only become apparent later in the adult bee: during the pupal stage, reserve cells associated with the fat body play a central role in rebuilding the bee, and some of them are then freely exposed in the haemolymph. If they are damaged by Varroa or taken up together with the haemolymph, the disturbance may go well beyond the visible development of the pupa itself. Late stress, especially thermal or parasitic stress, may also promote premature hive exiting that is fatal for young bees (Ellis & Rangel, 2024). These data broaden the practical relevance of the article: they do not change the description of metamorphosis, but they show why this phase is critical for the quality of future bees.

Convergence is therefore strong on the general mechanisms of metamorphosis. It is more cautious regarding apiary recommendations: laboratory studies define biological sensitivities but do not replace colony observation, varroa monitoring or adaptation to the local conditions of Switzerland and temperate Europe.

5. What does this mean at the apiary?

Metamorphosis does not impose a new method, but it helps work on brood with greater precision and caution.

• Use the 3-6-12 benchmark as a calculation basis for the worker, particularly for splits, queen rearing, queen introductions or brood-related treatments. But keep a margin: individual durations can vary.
• Read the brood more finely: eggs, young larvae, older larvae, capped brood, pre-pupae, pupae and emerging brood do not correspond to the same time spans or to the same risks.
• Limit unnecessary thermal stress on capped brood. Avoid leaving brood frames exposed for long periods to cold, wind or full sun, especially in young colonies, small nucs or under unstable weather.
• Do not overestimate the immediate strength of a colony just because many bees are emerging. A newly emerged bee still needs to harden its cuticle and complete its functional maturation before fully contributing to colony tasks.
• Connect metamorphosis with brood health: Varroa, viruses, nutrition, and temperature influence the quality of the bees produced. Understanding the role of the fat body during pupation also helps explain why varroosis can produce weakened adult bees, even when the damage is not immediately visible inside the cell. In Switzerland and temperate Europe, this reinforces the importance of careful Varroa monitoring before and during the production of winter bees.
• The general biology described is transposable to Swiss apiaries, since it concerns Apis mellifera. The practical implications, however, always depend on colony strength, altitude, season, weather, hive type and local varroa pressure.

 

Read the original study

Kievits, J. (2022). Métamorphose. La Santé de l'Abeille, 309, 257–270.

 

Further reading on ApiSavoir

• Metamorphosis
• From egg to imago
• Biology and physiology of the bee
• Sense and nonsense of hive thermal insulation
• Varroa mite infestation affects the thermoregulation of honey bee colonies
• Practical Guide: 1.6.3 Hyperthermia

 

References

Elias-Neto, M., Soares, M. P. M., & Bitondi, M. M. G. (2009). Changes in integument structure during the imaginal molt of the honey bee. Apidologie, 40, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1051/apido:2008064

Elias-Neto, M., Soares, M. P. M., Simões, Z. L. P., Hartfelder, K., & Bitondi, M. M. G. (2010). Developmental characterization, function and regulation of a Laccase2 encoding gene in the honey bee, Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apinae). Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 40(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2010.02.004

Elias-Neto, M., Soares, M. P. M., & Bitondi, M. M. G. (2013). Expression profile of a Laccase2 encoding gene during the metamorphic molt in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Revista Brasileira de Entomologia, 57, 213–216. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262013005000009

Ellis, J., & Rangel, J. (2024). Stress drives premature hive exiting behavior that leads to death in young honey bee (Apis mellifera) workers. Biological Research, 57. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-024-00569-z

Gonçalves, W. G., Fernandes, K. M., Santana, W. C., Martins, G. F., Zanuncio, J. C., & Serrão, J. E. (2017). Post-embryonic development of the Malpighian tubules in Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera) workers: Morphology, remodeling, apoptosis, and cell proliferation. Protoplasma, 255, 585–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-017-1171-3

Groh, C., Tautz, J., & Rössler, W. (2004). Synaptic organization in the adult honey bee brain is influenced by brood-temperature control during pupal development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101, 4268–4273. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400773101

Jay, S. C. (1962). Colour changes in honeybee pupae. Bee World, 43, 119–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1962.11096960

Jay, S. C. (1963). The development of honeybees in their cells. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2(2), 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.1963.11100072

Jay, S. C. (1964). The cocoon of the honey bee, Apis mellifera L. The Canadian Entomologist, 96(5), 784–792. https://doi.org/10.4039/Ent96784-5

Kievits, J. (2022). Métamorphose. La Santé de l'Abeille, 309, 257–270.

Mello, T. R. P., Aleixo, A. C., Pinheiro, D. G., Nunes, F. M. F., Bitondi, M. M. G., Hartfelder, K., Barchuk, A. R., & Simões, Z. L. P. (2014). Developmental regulation of ecdysone receptor (EcR) and EcR-controlled gene expression during pharate-adult development of honeybees (Apis mellifera). Frontiers in Genetics, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00445

Mędrzycki, P., Sgolastra, F., Bortolotti, L., Bogo, G., Tosi, S., Padovani, E., Porrini, C., & Sabatini, A. (2010). Influence of brood rearing temperature on honey bee development and susceptibility to poisoning by pesticides. Journal of Apicultural Research, 49, 52–59. https://doi.org/10.3896/IBRA.1.49.1.07

Oertel, E. (1930). Metamorphosis in the honeybee. Journal of Morphology, 50. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1050500202

Rachinsky, A., Strambi, C., Strambi, A., & Hartfelder, K. (1990). Caste and metamorphosis: Hemolymph titers of juvenile hormone and ecdysteroids in last instar honeybee larvae. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 79(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-6480(90)90085-Z

Silva-Zacarin, E. C. M., Tomaino, G. A., Brocheto-Braga, M. R., Taboga, S. R., Silva, L. A., & Moraes, R. L. M. S. (2007). Programmed cell death in the larval salivary glands of Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera, Apidae). Journal of Biosciences, 32, 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-007-0031-2

Tautz, J., Maier, S., Groh, C., Rössler, W., & Brockmann, A. (2003). Behavioral performance in adult honey bees is influenced by the temperature experienced during their pupal development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 7343–7347. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1232346100

Tettamanti, G., & Casartelli, M. (2019). Cell death during complete metamorphosis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 374. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0065

Wang, Q., Xu, X., Zhu, X., Chen, L., Zhou, S., Huang, Z. Y., & Zhou, B. (2016). Low-temperature stress during capped brood stage increases pupal mortality, misorientation and adult mortality in honey bees. PLoS ONE, 11. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154547

Yang, H., Shi, J., Liao, C., Yan, W., & Wu, X. (2021). Varroa destructor mite infestations in capped brood cells of honeybee workers affect emergence development and adult foraging ability. Current Zoology, 67, 569–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/cz/zoab002

Yu, J., Song, H., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Wang, H., & Xu, B. (2023). 20-hydroxyecdysone upregulates ecdysone receptor (EcR) gene to promote pupation in the honeybee, Apis mellifera ligustica. Integrative and Comparative Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad077

Yu, J., Wang, H., Liu, Z., & Xu, B. (2025). 20-Hydroxyecdysone promotes fat body lipolysis through autophagy during pupation in Apis mellifera. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics, 57, 101663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbd.2025.101663